ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
SimpleX Chat121d ago
Our users asked many questions about Chat Control, as discussions were restarted in the EU this week. SimpleX Chat is an open-source app where users control the code and the servers they use. Therefore it is impossible to implement any client-side scanning, and it will not happen. If the law is passed, two options are possible: - we might need to stop offering preset servers to the EU users. - we will not need to change anything - this is the most likely outcome. Our operations are always consistent with our Privacy Policy (https://simplex.chat/privacy), and we would rather shut down than do anything that contradicts this agreement with our users.
💬 12 replies

Replies (12)

dackdel121d ago
You gonna add shitcoins to simplex?
0000 sats
ꓘɨℓσꬺƄɨP110ꓘɳσ[Ŧƨ] 𓅦丰121d ago
They already did it
0000 sats
SimpleX Chat121d ago
No, and not going to.
0000 sats
1984121d ago
Really disappointed with your voucher / token stuf... There is no need for this, there is no second best to BTC and micro-payments with Lightningg already exist
0000 sats
SimpleX Chat121d ago
No
0000 sats
AU9913121d ago
Most folks still don't understand why the shitcoinery.
0000 sats
SimpleX Chat121d ago
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsgrphj8s6y7zl9jvgdxrvwzzkj9…
0000 sats
AU9913121d ago
Why wouldn't I just pay for a server with bitcoin? I don't understand why the extra step.
0000 sats
ꓘɨℓσꬺƄɨP110ꓘɳσ[Ŧƨ] 𓅦丰120d ago
This 👆
0000 sats
Eede3d9…795382120d ago
You want to follow the discussion before drawing conclusions. You'll be able to buy the vouchers with Bitcoin and Monero.
0000 sats
SimpleX Chat119d ago
Several reasons: - payment either requires using private cryptocurrencies, that most people don't use, or exposes identity to operators - vouchers make purchase and payment unlinkable - direct payments create risks of operator default - we want to build zero-trust model - no effective way to codify revenue-sharing agreement - again, risk of defaults, not honouring agreement, etc. All these problems are solved with smart contracts, and we don't see any simpler solution. The question is similar to "why SimpleX network needs private message routing?" To protect users privacy and security from their contacts. As the number of operators grow, it's important to protect users from operators.
0000 sats
AU9913118d ago
I don't understand why you need to protect users from operator defaults. This seems to be the main premise for the smart contracts, no? Also I don't understand how/why paying with lightning exposes identity of the sender. Ecash seems to also solve this already.
0000 sats