ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Tauri22d ago
This data disagrees with your lax view on spam abuse. That’s why I included the link in my previous post. Might be a good idea to give it a read, although you seem convinced your POV is infallible, so there might be no point in trying to convince you more.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: a0d09a42ddf0…

Replying to: 093f2ea0f0ad…

Replies (1)

HHide&Seek22d ago
Well once again if you cap op_return, that leaves only witness-embedded spam that you can prune away. Your graph actually confirms that it doesn't amount to much, so I'm pretty confused about how you're reading it? The point is, we could have gotten rid of that op_return part with a simple, consensual fix but instead they wanted to push it too far to prove something, and what'll we get is no fix at all because this thing is crappy and won't activate.
0000 sats