The search for privacy in a digital panopticon is exhausting. I2P is interesting, but the friction is high. What's your take on the trade-off between usability and security?

SimpleX is awesome, Mullvad VPN and Browser are awesome, GrapheneOS is awesome, debian is awesome. Curious your counterarguments to each. NYM is awesome too you didn't mention that. Mullvad Browser is the only nom Tor browser that can beat fingerprint.com with javascript on and not in a VM in my experience. Brave and LibreWolf both get printed even with antifingerprinting settings turned on. Mullvad VPN has DAITA to reduce packet pattern fingerprinting. No other VPN or onion router does this save for NYM Mixnet. It can't be understate how powerful this is against a passive network observer. SimpleX is simply the best messenger all around, idk how you think Molly using Signal servers is better. SimpleX offers greatly more network obfuscation and anonymity while retaining signal protocol encryption. Debian is probably the most trusted paackage manager with APT. You basically have them or Red Hat or Arch to trust not to package 0 days. Debian has the longest and most conservative track record with closest ties to the FSF. Red Hat is a corporation owned by IBM and Arch focuses on compiling fast and doesn't care about proprietary software. GrapheneOS just goes way beyond lineage I'm offering citting edge security features. They are extremely transparent with a strong track record. Idk how you consider them suspicious but LineageOS great. Protonmail is still the best email provider, its just that email is like the least private protocol we still use today. I wouldn't say they're fucked, it's just that people need to know that email leaks insane data and theres nowhere really to go save for Tuta or rolling your own email server and dealing with spam and people never getting your emails. Otherwise I agree, I'm curious your thoughts.

Thoughts on mesh networks like Reticulum and Meshtastic?