ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Mischa24d ago
“For the record, if Core gets routed around with Libre Relay, etc., the answer isn’t to turn Core into Libre Relay.” Very true, but it could be addressed by reducing OP_RETURN at the consensus level. I believe the legal dimension is more relevant, even if, in theory, node operators are not doing anything illegal themselves. The fact that they are not responsible for the content does not eliminate the practical risk. If illegal material is embedded in the blockchain, running a node could still expose someone to legal scrutiny or prosecution on the grounds that they are distributing, or storing that data. This risk may be especially significant in developing, or more authoritarian countries, where legal systems are less predictable and due process is weaker. The recent events surrounding Samurai Wallet show that even when individuals are acting within the law, authorities may still pursue aggressive enforcement actions. That reality should be taken seriously when changing fundemental things in bitcoin.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: a0d09a42ddf0…

Replying to: 34647bb098a7…

Replies (1)

Leo Wandersleb24d ago
If Bitcoin can get outlawed, it will. We are winning because it can't as a whole. I don't subscribe to that part of your post. I could get behind reducing OP_RETURN at the consensus level although to a much higher value than 0 or 83B. Make it 500 or 1kB or at least 150B. Something that's not getting in the way of meaningfully longer hashes that we might need in a quantum future but still too small for nasty pictures. But to support the bip110 madness is a bridge too far.
0000 sats