ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Tauri3d ago
Block size is a physical constraint, not an optimization mechanism. It limits throughput, it doesn’t decide what should occupy that space. Even with smaller blocks, you can still end up with blocks packed full of spam. That pushes monetary transactions into the backlog and raises the cost of getting them confirmed. The constraint alone doesn’t guarantee the space is used for the purpose Bitcoin was built for. It only guarantees that competition for that space becomes more expensive. As we’ve seen, fees don’t outprice spam.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 2eb46aee4c44…

Replying to: 3ad5ee6a3363…

Replies (1)

Cody3d ago
I think of fees won't price out spam then what's being added either isn't "spam" or Bitcoin as a monetary network is a joke. Currently Bitcoin for tx's is a joke. And we have out scaled the demand for tx's by orders of magnitude. Lightning, Liquid, Ark,Spark. All compressing transactions and reducing demand for block space(making it cheaper) which invites spam
0000 sats