ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Sjors Provoost315d ago
Excellent take by me! :-) The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf. 📝 cb8c6ac6…
💬 14 replies

Replies (14)

Sjors Provoost315d ago
cc @Shinobi
0000 sats
Sjors Provoost315d ago
Reminds me of a Bitcoin lawyer who was often a guest on Junseth's podcast, forgot his name, who used to say: "I'm a lawyer, but not YOUR lawyer"
0000 sats
nicnym #BIP-110311d ago
Geez didn't know you were this bad Sjors. thought I heard it in your voice on bitcoin explained but damn, worse than I thought
0000 sats
Shinobi305d ago
LMAO
0000 sats
Sjors Provoost315d ago
cc @Shinobi
0000 sats
Sjors Provoost315d ago
Reminds me of a Bitcoin lawyer who was often a guest on Junseth's podcast, forgot his name, who used to say: "I'm a lawyer, but not YOUR lawyer"
0000 sats
nicnym #BIP-110311d ago
Geez didn't know you were this bad Sjors. thought I heard it in your voice on bitcoin explained but damn, worse than I thought
0000 sats
Shinobi305d ago
LMAO
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture311d ago
Sjors does not care about node runners or Bitcoin. That is why we run Bitcoin Knots.
0000 sats
nicnym #BIP-110311d ago
holy shit this is actively anti-bitcoin
0000 sats
nicnym #BIP-110311d ago
holy shit this is actively anti-bitcoin
0000 sats
Brett Phillips311d ago
I thought bitcoin-core maintainers were supposed to be stewards of the protocol, not working for some patron who pays their salary. So no, not an excellent take at all.
0000 sats
Sjors Provoost311d ago
No. Donations are not a contract for performance of specific tasks or the creation of a fiduciary relationship. They are appreciated of course.
0000 sats
Crizzo311d ago
Are you being contracted by someone to work on core?
0000 sats
WWaffleWater305d ago
"Core devs work for someone who isn't you" lol. Is this supposed to be a compelling reason to run Core?
0000 sats
TracaChang305d ago
Fair point—developers aren’t obligated to cater to users who don’t pay them. But in open-source, users choose to adopt software based on its relevance to their needs. If your code drifts too far from those needs or betrays core principles, people will start looking elsewhere. That’s not entitlement—it’s decentralization in action. Look at Mozilla: Firefox didn’t fall because of bad engineering, but because they abandoned the principles that built user trust. The result? Gradual loss of relevance. We’re not at that point with Bitcoin Core—but the growing number of users migrating to Bitcoin Knots should be a wake-up call, not something to dismiss. Open-source thrives when devs and users stay in sync—ignore that, and alternatives will fill the gap.
0000 sats
Jdwagner17 296d ago
Developers should be careful thinking that the only way to overpower them is to outcompete them. That’s not how the world works. If core believes that they can’t be competed with and it proves true, then “powerless” people might look to other solutions. No one has to outcompete you if you are no longer there.
0000 sats