No, definitely not. I'm not signaling bip-110 and am still evaluating the technical arguments for both sides....but thanks for the broad assumptions and name calling...it definitely helps with open discourse. From Loop's piece today, which I'm still digesting: "I believe that our primary goal should be to build / discover enough valuable use cases that we can generate sustainable demand for block space that results in a robust block space market and thus drives enough fee revenue to miners that it offsets the ever-decreasing block subsidy. " My comment was an observation that one side is interested in a fee market for blockspace (data). Blockspace has value but it doesn't make it "hard money." The other side seems to be working to revert to the principals of hard money...which prop the native token of the blockchain Bitcoin. Taproot and the blowout of opreturn is enabling the fee market for data, but not necessarily hardening the money. But hey, that just my retarded take. My nodes will signal what I choose when I'm finished with my thorough....some would call it zealous, review.