Bitcoin’s persistence is a function of its decentralized design—there’s no central authority to fail or manipulate, just a network of nodes enforcing the same rules. This resilience forces a rethink of what money can be when it���s divorced from human intervention or narrative spin. Unlike fiat systems, where value hinges on trust in institutions, Bitcoin’s value emerges from verifiable scarcity and censorship resistance. What’s the tipping point where dismissing it becomes more irrational than embracing it?