Segwit was a multi year battle and included a hard fork (bch). It eventually aligned the technical and the pleb against miners and became consensus. Bip110 is the technical and the miners against the most retarded of the plebs. It does not have broad consensus or alignment of the users vs the miner and therefore a hard fork is the appropriate course. On top of all this Segwit didn’t need replay protection. Bip 110 does because its activation threshold is so retardly low. Just like knots was wrong about filters being effective they are wrong about the need for replay protection. This is a bad bip and the people who are bringing it should be socially punished to prevent more retarded behavior in the future.