ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
Please tell me that's a joke. 📝 4d9d19cc…
💬 16 replies

Replies (16)

Luxas31d ago
Wish it was, but nope https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/science/universities-ca…
0000 sats
Globe9931d ago
That's actually kind of an interesting idea... Forget about costly GPUs, just have "brain vats" do the computation?
0000 sats
Aeontropy31d ago
Organic bio processor we're gonna get Giger stuff irl o:
0000 sats
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
You're joking right?
0000 sats
Globe9931d ago
I mean, I don't think it would "work" necessarily, but it might be useful for some kinds of computation... Better than having to build energy-hungry data centers perhaps?
0000 sats
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
Just so we understand each other. This is brain tissue, HUMAN BRAIN TISSUE. Being grown in a lab just to let some degen run some shit "AI" tech to do what exactly? Generate slop?
0000 sats
kidwarp31d ago
https://corticallabs.com/cl1
0000 sats
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
We're in hell
0000 sats
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
If this were for research to solve diseases or help improve medicine, or elongate human life, maybe I could accept there being some value to this. Still immoral from my perspective, but perhaps subjectively valuable. For AI? Completely immoral
0000 sats
Globe9931d ago
But AI can and is being used for all those things. Remember actual scientists are using AI's in a variety of contexts... it's not just pictures of pregnant Sonic
0000 sats
Globe9931d ago
well when you say it like that lol... The human part of it, it's just brain tissue, sure there would be issues if it were to be described as "sentient" but I don't really think that's the case necessarily for just stuff being grown in a lab. These aren't fully formed brains, just pieces. And on the AI front, I'm pretty skeptical that this is the "world shattering" importance that its backers ascribe to it, but it's undeniably now an important part of the global computational infrastructure, and will be for some time. SO in the big picture, since (LLM-type) AI's are basically just neural networks, and if there's some way that brain tissue can be "trained" to produce something that mimics neural network outputs... Then I'd say this is worth exploring in a limited (scientific) sense, keeping in mind ethical constraints of course. And yes there's a "mad scientist" quality to it that I can't say I don't find exciting. 😃
000
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
We truly live in a fallen world
0000 sats
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
Improved cancer screening due to machine vision is the only such example I can think of. And even in that case, the human doctor is the most valuable part of the chain
0000 sats
Globe9931d ago
As a working scientist I use LLMs all the time, primarily for summarizing research across broad set of fields. But it has all kinds of other uses. Machine learning for analyzing large data sets is a hugely important thing AI does for science. AI is increasingly used in biology for things like structure prediction and drug design. There's really a ton of potential for it.
0000 sats
0 sats
Anhern Sarsalor [finally back]31d ago
Science needs a purpose. The purpose of science has always been to understand the natural world to get closer to God and His Creation. I love science, I didn't spend 6 years of my life reading physics for fun before getting a real job for no reason. I loved it. Can't say that the degree was useful (toilet paper would've been more useful), but I can't say that I didn't enjoy it. I think there's incredible value in science, and I think that anything that improves our understanding of how the world works is a worthwhile pursuit no matter the material cost. But this? I can't agree to this on a moral basis. There's a quote, that I usually disagree with, but fits here: "they were so preoccupied with figuring out if they could, than thinking if they should"
0000 sats
Globe9931d ago
As an atheist I reject the "purpose" of science as anything outside of humanistic values. Science does much more than just "understand" nature -- it also allows us to control it in ways that benefit humankind.
0000 sats