And so be it. I have no incentive to protect the spam, so I'm happy to exclude it from the blockchain. Until I find a reason why I should protect it, I won't. And being that nothing is being added to Bitcoin via BIP-110, it's actually the 91% of the network forking off. If they want spam, they can have it. I have no reason to respect spam as real transactional data. The argument in the podcast says "that could be dangerous for Bitcoin". In the end, consensus wins, and in this case Bitcoin favors BIP-110. The users have spoken, and will continue to speak. I don't think I am retarded for wanting Bitcoin to be money. I also don't think core 30 introduced any changes that "protects" Bitcoin more than BIP-110. To that avail, I think spam is retarded. People can use whichever chain they want. No one can stop BIP-110 and that's why Bitcoin is great money. If Bitcoiners want consensus, they can opt out of Core 30, or convince everyone else why they shouldn't. Apparently the majority of people don't care to opt out. I won't let that stop me from doing it. All I hear is bullying and fear-mongering from the other side. If BIP-110 was dangerous, there would be a better case against it. Reducing the size of OP_RETURN does not hurt me financially or physically. It only serves to protect my coins. I cannot find a single reason to join 30, and I cannot find a reason not to signal BIP-110.