ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Cykros33d ago
Ecash is interesting but arguably more for its ability to work offline and some unique approaches to privacy. But also like Lightning, scaling isn't just spacial. Executing faster is temporal scaling and frankly in many cases seems at least as important, especially right now. Keys are all well and good but if you're querying the network with an untrustworthy node (ie, one that isn't yours) a lot breaks down. When you and your payee see different data, what settles the disagreement? As for indications soon, no. The arguments if anything are to shrink blocks or otherwise remove the segwit discount. Also concerns that with block space in such low demand we may need to explore ways to keep miners incentivized. If there's any reason to expand blockspace it'll be far off in the future.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 7cf9eb02a4db…

Replying to: d8bb533b330d…

Replies (1)

Hanshan33d ago
arguably because The Narrative for the last 9 years has been to move actual financial transactions to L2. That's where all the real effort of the industry and 90% of the social narrative in Bitcoin has been. if there had just been a block size increase and no huge push to make lightning The Answer, things would look appreciably different. I don't think it's plausible to argue that normies trusting a node run by Uncle Jim or a paid service is a huge problem, but that trusted L2 and L3 solutions are NOT a problem.
0000 sats