Thanks for the correction. I agree with the unjust prosecution concern, I wonder whether the codebase already changed too far to avoid that, and the changes now make BIP 110 look like an outlier. How did Taproot pass so easily when it seems to have a significant part in enabling data store misuse? I noticed no larger public debate around it. Even with all thought that presumably went into BIP 110, can it simplify any further while still minimizing image or 3D file embed risk?