If you knew anything before spouting off bullshit, you would know I'm making an AMM protocol on liquid. That means using covenants that don't exist yet in Bitcoin. Why would I do that... Idk maybe so we can actually use covenants in practice, show they work and improve L1 with newly activated ones. It's a roadmap to have them on Bitcoin. I'm working day and night to build the improvements you want to see on Bitcoin itself and you're so emotionally captured that you're incapable of holding any conversation that could have been constructive to your own ends. L2s are going to exist. You can't stop them. Their existence is not automatically inherently bad for Bitcoin. Their half steps in achieving what we all want. Lightning for instance has grown adoption more than any other thing in Bitcoin I would argue and even lightning is shit and has a lot of UX problems.