ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nunya Bidness21d ago
OMG! We so need BIP-110! Look at all that spam.
💬 11 replies

Replies (11)

Oshi (推し)21d ago
The agony!!!! We need .00005 s/vb or I’m doing a fork
0000 sats
ภ๏รtг๏ภคยt21d ago
🤣🤣🤣🤣
0000 sats
2Pac21d ago
🤣
0000 sats
2Pac21d ago
Almost like there is a hidden agenda or something 🤔
0000 sats
Meyer21d ago
@Matty Mick
0000 sats
Matty Mick21d ago
You’re doing your best to gaslight here, particularly after I said I’m not signaling bip-110. You could easily look at the mempool screenshot and draw the conclusion that the taproot enabled workarounds that allowed inscriptions and dust utxo bloat is livable and that fees would drive them out with more L1 use, but also conclude that unilaterally blowing out op-return opens additional unwanted vectors that an 83 byte return didnt. 🤷‍♂️. Balance takes are lost here on both sides but again, you’ve concluded that those trying to learn, assess and decide are retarded if they dont agree with you.
0000 sats
Meyer21d ago
🤣 Projection much? The only reason why I am conversing with you is because you responded to a post of mine with “because one side doesn't think its money” Don’t play the victim game here Please go ahead and run bip110
0000 sats
RamenCoffee21d ago
Lol
0000 sats
Jay21d ago
It's the end of the world man! Bitcoin's already dead at this point.
0000 sats
BushRat20d ago
If you ignore or deny the core dev pedophiles trying to turn Bitcoin from money into data hosting you are an enabler. Stop trying to defend pedophiles. If you actually care about Bitcoin take a stand against core pedos
0000 sats
Meyer19d ago
🦗
0000 sats