How many lies did you need to believe to write this post? For instance, the lie that Satoshi created money independent of purity. Without purity from fiat values that informed Satoshi, Bitcoin wouldn't exist. “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.” Separation of fiat church and Bitcoin is imbedded from its inception, and there's nothing neutral about that. If you don't like how the very human origin story Satoshi wrote dictates Bitcoin values world, you're free to pay your fees for whatever you want, and you're free to receive what you paid for, off chain. Without Satoshi's intent, the Bitcoin protocol wouldn't exist for this purpose, and nodes enforce this purpose, since rules are downstream from meaning. Claiming neutrality is performative contradiction. Reality, ie, origin, meaning, rules, and systems, once bent, tend to slap back into place.