Derek Ross13d agoNo, I did not. I reacted. I don't want Shitcoins in an app I rely on. If it's just a link to do swaps as I said below then your newsletter over sold the feature. If it's just a link then the core functionality is not impacted. Thanks for letting me know. I'll look into it before I make a decision.
💬 2 replies
Thread context
Root: 9d5d95330d35…
Replying to: d70ac386b75d…
Replies (2)
dvo13d agothis is my concern too. pointing to an external swap is ok if really necessary, but if core functionality is at all integrated with shitcoinery, it's inherently poisoned. I know alby has a history of taking a hard stance against shitcoins so I'm not concerned, at least until I see a reason to be
0000 sats
bumi13d agohm, sounds like you're hard to please. 😉
Do you think onramps and swap services are evil shitcoin stuff?
but please maybe first check and give us constructive feedback what you like and need. would be nice if you could share a screenshot of the feature you don't like.
0000 sats