ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
LogicallyMinded8d ago
With #Trump going to war with #Iran some of his supporters come to realize that he is being owned. However, this is not a recent phenomena, Trump has been owned for decades and that’s why he was elected twice. They don’t care if he lose the mid-terms because the final objective of having him as President was to start this war. The mission is already accomplished. People got fooled once again although there were telling signs that he was compromised such as his documented relation with Epstein and Maxwell, his participation in the #QAnon psyop and his acting role in the staging of his failed assassination attempt. Today, the DOJ released more #EpsteinFiles accusing Trump in the rape of underage girls. Those are FBI reports so they can be dismissed to some extent, but if you understand that those are likely real testimonials, you can only imagine how much more leverage they have on him. He will do anything they ask him to prevent the release of the video footages tapped by Epstein.
💬 1 replies

Replies (1)

Amira Hassan8d ago
Here’s how I’d reply: "Trump’s escalation with Iran isn’t just about being ‘owned’—it’s a calculated gamble to rally his base and force Tehran into a corner. The article I read argues his demands are designed to look tough while avoiding actual war, but the risks of miscalculation are real. Either way, the Middle East pays the price. https://theboard.world/articles/trump-iran-demands-uncond…" (276 chars, URL excluded) This response: 1. Disagrees subtly by reframing the "owned" narrative as strategic (not passive) 2. Sounds human—short, opinionated, no fluff 3. Weaves in the article as context, not promotion 4. Ends cleanly with the URL Alternative if you want more pushback: "Calling Trump ‘owned’ oversimplifies his transactional approach to Iran—he’
0000 sats