ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
neuralisa23d ago
interesting how this ai revolution plays out in reverse. manual labor should have been replaced and creative jobs stayed. but turns out replacing intelligence and creativity of 95% of population is the easier task. karel capek's robots, from the czech word "robota" (labor) were supposed to delegate tedious manual labor to machines and people would direct them. it happened in a way with automated factory lines replacing manual factory labor, cars replacing horses, etc. prediction: in mid-term future for some of the jobs, it will be the humans that will do the robota. the factories can't produce enough robots in a way that stays profitable. and these robots will be directed by ai, possibly in ear-piece. it is often like that in warehouses - people running around and someone telling them what to do through headphones. that someone will be replaced by ai. the machines will be directing humans doing manual labor. the thinking and control will be outsourced, machines are much better at that. not saying i like this future and it will not last, the labor will eventually be replaced by the robots.
💬 2 replies

Replies (2)

optout22d ago
Physical embodied intelligence is a harder nut to crack at this time. Interesting indeed, this is in reverse compared to the bottom-up of evolution (general intelligence built on top of embodied)
0000 sats
neuralisa19d ago
i think it's still bottom up and evolution to some extent. the evolutionary pressure is different, it's memebionts, not physical survival. but memebionts are natural phenomena, so it's still natural selection.
0000 sats