ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Susie Violet37d ago
“Gemini’s exit seems to be about friction. The company is leaving the UK, Europe and Australia while focusing on the US and Singapore, which tells you capital is moving to jurisdictions where firms can operate with clarity and scale. Prolonged regulatory uncertainty in the UK makes it harder to hire, invest and build compliant operations, and that has real consequences.” This is what I told Payment Expert on Gemini's exits. Gemini is describing a regulatory regime that is more expensive and less certain than alternatives, leaving firms to reallocate to where they are treated best. If the FCA and UK policymakers want innovation here, they need to fix that rather than celebrate frameworks that chase business away. Full article: https://paymentexpert.com/2026/02/06/gemini-lay-offs-exit…
💬 6 replies

Replies (6)

Dug37d ago
Turns out Rachel’s comment “we’ll regulate for growth” was wrong. How strange?
0000 sats
DecBytes37d ago
It is more the type of regulation. Permissioned vs Permissionless. Innovators in the EU have to prove that their innovations will not do any harm, especially to established businesses, before they are allowed to operate. EU regulators have a preferred outcome in mind when they pass regulations. E.g green energy above nuclear or gas. Programmable cryptocurrencies above Bitcoin. "When public policy discourages risk-taking and actively regulates to disallow permissionless innovation, the result is less entrepreneurialism, diminished competition, fewer consumer choices, and stagnated economic growth." — Adam Thierer
0000 sats
Dug37d ago
🫡🙌
0000 sats
captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜37d ago
TWIN CLOWNS PIMPS
0000 sats
captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜37d ago
TWIN CLOWNS PIMPS
0000 sats
DecBytes37d ago
Predictable that this would have happened. The EU operates on the Precautionary Principle, where innovators have to proof they will do no harm prior to innovation and policymakers have the illusion that they can central plan innovation and their preferred end result. And they do this with the illusion that policy does not cost anything. Reagan started targeted deregulation, the Republican House and Clinton solidified it. From this point onward you see the two economies diverge drastically, with the US far outgrowing the EU. This is one of the reasons I am looking at moving to the US.
0000 sats