ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Bitcoin Bazar8h ago
Never said they were not correct. Just that it seems that Spark remains an improvement compared to fully custodial LN.
💬 2 replies

Thread context

Root: 29008fc014eb…

Replying to: a6d319d7c251…

Replies (2)

unSATiated2h ago
I'm not sure about that. When all the SSPs are run by one entity, how self-custodial is it really? Sure, you can unilaterally exit, but that's only a small benefit. Privacy-wise it's much worse than LN, because it operates with similar properties as the main chain. You're going from trusting one LN custodian to trusting another LN custodian LightSpark) on a much more transparent/trackable chain. I really want to like Spark (and Ark), but it doesn't seem like its glaring and serious issues are addressed yet. Until such time I advise everyone to stay away from it. It rather seems like everyone is pushing Spark because it's easy, and legally qualifies as "self-custodial", so gets around Google's recent KYC requirement.
0000 sats
Bitcoin Bazar2h ago
Spark is just literally as bad for privacy as a custodial lightning service, not better not worse. But add the unilateral exit choice. So how is it not an improvement?
0000 sats