ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
ODELL156d ago
💬 49 replies

Replies (49)

ODELL156d ago
the coward move would be to give in to your harassment and blindly recommend people run knots go fuck yourself
0000 sats
atyh156d ago
musical version:
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr156d ago
So inform yourself and recommend Knots NON-blindly🤦‍♂️
0000 sats
ODELL156d ago
seems more reasonable to run core 28 or 29 are you going to bring on more maintainers or is your plan to just keep shipping knots releases on your own
0000 sats
ODELL156d ago
i dont think thats even close to the same level of concern i dont think you think so either so why lie
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr156d ago
It's way bigger. This is more like gold confiscation
0000 sats
ODELL156d ago
nope
0000 sats
MAV21156d ago
Tik tok next block
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr156d ago
There's an actual fire tho
0000 sats
ODELL156d ago
nope and having one person maintain the software for the majority of nodes on the network is probably worse than the status quo 📝 4bee3eb0…
0000 sats
MrHodl155d ago
🫂
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
That doesn't put out the fire, it turns up the heat. Why do you want an airdrop so bad?
0000 sats
MrHodl155d ago
Because when there's a consensus failure between participants, chain splits is how they get resolved.
0000 sats
Dave🐸153d ago
Mechanic is in!
0000 sats
Matt Corallo155d ago
Final decision on what? They changed defaults, you can change them in bitcoin.conf pretty easily…
0000 sats
/dev/fd0155d ago
> explicitly created to prevent developer capture by corporate interests
0000 sats
MrHodl155d ago
Go bored of monero?
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
It would take less than that for you to think about it. It was a one-line claim that isn't true.
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
$ gpg --verify SHA256SUMS.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'SHA256SUMS' gpg: Signature made Fri 10 Oct 2025 05:14:58 PM EDT gpg: using EDDSA key 1A3E761F19D2CC7785C5502EA291A2C45D0C504A gpg: Good signature from "Luke Dashjr (Codesigning) <luke-jr+git@utopios.org>" [unknown] Primary key fingerprint: 1A3E 761F 19D2 CC77 85C5 502E A291 A2C4 5D0C 504A gpg: Signature made Sat 11 Oct 2025 04:06:25 PM EDT gpg: using RSA key 1D70CBE4B42239445617D33DD316C8140185B647 gpg: Good signature from "shiny (Bitcoin Knots attestations) <bigshiny90@gmail.com>" [unknown] Primary key fingerprint: 1D70 CBE4 B422 3944 5617 D33D D316 C814 0185 B647 gpg: Signature made Mon 13 Oct 2025 09:41:15 AM EDT gpg: using RSA key C1BCB7169AF1A07A0C5E471A047509FA0A6D7350 gpg: issuer "ataraxia.009.work@gmail.com" gpg: Good signature from "ataraxia009 <ataraxia.009.work@gmail.com>" [unknown] Primary key fingerprint: C1BC B716 9AF1 A07A 0C5E 471A 0475 09FA 0A6D 7350 Likely more coming... 29.1 had 7 signers.
000
Luke Dashjr155d ago
Eight, actually*
0000 sats
Matt Corallo155d ago
No. Changing the config to the previous default basically has the same outcome as the previous code.
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
That’s when the release was published. The signature file was updated at my local time 8:57AM today. Odell’s tweet was at 9:51AM. Sounds like a misunderstanding
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
Correct
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
The 2nd signature was created 2 days ago. Not sure when it was added to the GitHub release. https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2…
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
👍 nice everyone shake hands. @ODELL come up with a better reason why you don’t like knots Looking forward to a 3rd implementation, I hate core more than I love knots.
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
I don’t agree with that framing, filtering out a certain class of txns (spam) isn’t censorship. Censorship is filtering out individual txns based on individual characteristics. Filters have been around forever, they’ve been working just fine. The busy body dumbfucks at core should have left things alone. If they wanted to tinker with fun little open source projects they should have found something else and left my money alone.
0000 sats
Matt Corallo155d ago
The only difference is the data can be split over a few more outputs (AFAIU), but the total data is limited to whatever you set.
0000 sats
Matt Corallo155d ago
Consensus on policy isn’t a thing? Anyone can change the config to anything they want, by definition there is no consensus.
0000 sats
ODELL149d ago
in hindsight my position on saylor was probably too aggressive, half of bitcoin twitter hates me for that my position on this issue has been clear and transparent, discussed at length on both my shows and nostr for over a year 📝 0f9aec62…
0000 sats
inpc149d ago
Maybe you should have posted that in ALL CAPS?
0000 sats
inpc149d ago
People need to adjust to the new normal in the Post Caps era.
0000 sats
ODELL149d ago
there was a conference at the hotel i was staying at yesterday, topic was the new normal this must have been what they were discussing
0000 sats
Chris Krause23d ago
0000 sats
Chris Krause23d ago
AKA Bitter
0000 sats
MAV21156d ago
Main character syndrome is real
0000 sats
Matt Corallo156d ago
Please recommend 29, not 28. 29 enables zero-fee-commitments for lightning, which is a really important feature in some cases!
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
Only one maintainer ships each Core release. The "on your own" has always been nothing but FUD.
0000 sats
ODELL155d ago
the latest core release was signed by over ten people the latest knots release was only signed by you
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
That's simply not true at all.
0000 sats
SoapMiner155d ago
Running v28.01 until dust settles 🤙
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
Why do you keep repeating the FUD and denying the problem? This is why people are losing trust in you.
0000 sats
0 sats
ODELL155d ago
i checked both myself, please explain what is not true to all of us?
0000 sats
Luke Dashjr155d ago
There's already 3 signers for the builds, with likely more coming.
0000 sats
ODELL155d ago
more than 10 signatures: https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-30.0/SHA256SUMS.asc only your sig: https://bitcoinknots.org/files/29.x/29.2.knots20251010/SH… anyone can verify that themselves, weird thing to lie about
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
It’s signed by Luke and bigshiny90@gmail.com
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
3 signatures and counting, verified myself. Did you?
0000 sats
ODELL155d ago
he swapped the file, look at the timestamp of the last sig glad there are more signers
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
Signature file on GitHub says it’s 4 hours old. Did you verify when it first came out I guess?
0000 sats
Praveen Perera155d ago
Shiny signed it 2 days ago atraxia an hour-ish before your note https://github.com/bitcoinknots/guix.sigs/tree/knots/29.2…
0000 sats