ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
OrangeSurf30d ago
There's been lots of debate about Core v30 removing the OP_RETURN size/count policy defaults, so I ran the numbers for the latest mempool research report: https://research.mempool.space/opreturn-report/ There were three big waves of OP_RETURN usage: 2019, 2024, 2025. Nearly all standard transactions. The nonstandard ones are so rare you can hardly see them on the chart. The 2019 Veriblock wave actually put more data on-chain than anything since. People talk about recent OP_RETURN usage like it's unprecedented, but surprisingly it isn't. The important thing is that the spikes in nonstandard OP_RETURNs were in Mar 2024, May 2025, Aug 2025. All before v30 shipped in November 2025. The rate hasn't gone up since. At all. In fact it's come down Runes transactions were standard under the old rules and would even still be standard for #BIP110 (the proposal that's supposedly aims to curb data embedding). If these guys are serious about stopping data they should block runes. TL;DR: v30 recognised what was already occasionally happening on-chain. Nonstandard OP_RETURNs are vanishingly rare, haven't increased post-v30, and the current wave is already cooling off. The data doesn't support the panic. Read the full report linked below 👇 https://research.mempool.space/opreturn-report/
💬 16 replies

Replies (16)

cloud fodder30d ago
i hate everything about all of this. fuck the fuckers. core and knots. they seem to have sold or lost all their coins anyway, do they even care about bitcoin or are they just a bunch of butthurt c++ nocoiners.
0000 sats
ndeet30d ago
Looks like Core got fooled by fake market demand.
0000 sats
ManyKeys30d ago
Runes are not being addressed by BIP110 is a good point. People need drama; the data talk is too dry for them.
0000 sats
Hazey30d ago
Those transactions side stepped the mempool and entered the blockchain by being submitted directly to miners via API. If Slipstream isn't a centralizing attack on bitcoin I don't know what is. Luckily wallets hadn't been built for it, and V30 removes the incentive to do it.
0000 sats
ThymeKeeper29d ago
Slipstream absolutely was an attack on the network, but it was only possible because the filler was only applied in policy, not in consensus. Bip110 would reject blocks containing transactions from slipstream. Core v30 didn't fix anything, it just opened the door for abuse wider.
0000 sats
Hazey30d ago
You can't leave those out without a hard fork. Even then, other ways will be found, and then what, fork again? The (non)solution sounds worse than the symptom
0000 sats
Ccheesypleb29d ago
That's nonsense. I can confirm as someone that actually runs a node that bandwidth and CPU usage are considerably less running a knots node than it was with core. What you are arguing is nodes should just follow miners. That's the wrong way around, miners work for the network, nodes signal what we want to see in the network. I will filter my mempool how I want not how compromised core devs paymasters want me to.
0000 sats
GameBoyBTC29d ago
👀🤔
0000 sats
Jimmy29d ago
Core can unilaterally do whatever the fuck they want with Core. You on the other hand can choose to run whatever the fuck you want. Same as it ever was.
0000 sats
Des Imoto マキシ29d ago
Response of a 13 year old…
0000 sats
Tauri24d ago
Wasn’t Core a community project? I must have missed when it became a private endeavour for 5 people. 🤔
0000 sats
ThymeKeeper29d ago
This is a disingenuous argument, BIP110 does more than restore the op_return filter, it also fixes the taproot inscriptions fiasco and several other things. I did an analysis of my own, and found that BIP110 would have saved the blockchain from 650mb of garbage in January.
0000 sats
Hazey28d ago
How else did they get into a block then?
0000 sats
otto26d ago
They were relayed through regular nodes running libre relay. I myself had one running and saw many transactions > 80 bytes in my logs. Made several posts about it with txids so anyone could verify.
0000 sats
Jimmy25d ago
It's quite literally how Core and Bitcoin works. If you weren't aware of this that's on you. Core doesn't work for you.
0000 sats
Des Imoto マキシ25d ago
That‘s my point. The hubris. Core Devs got corrupted. #BIP110.
0000 sats