ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
PayPerQ63d ago
Yes. We've thought quite a bit about this option. I even had a call with @50d94fc2…df281d63 on it. Don't want to leave you hanging here, but we'll probably respond in a more long form brainstorming post here coming up soon.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 427fc95c3857…

Replying to: 074d0b462260…

Replies (1)

Leo Wandersleb63d ago
I think it could be done without changes to the UI. So instead of a creditId and a hosted wallet, the wallet would be in the client. Now the over-payment issue you always have when you don't know how much the service will cost can be solved by returning eTokens with the server answer. Always charge the theoretical maximum of the model and with the reply, return change. Only problem is the backup of that extra data but that could be encrypted using the "creditId" to stick with the same UI.
0000 sats