ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Ars Technica - All News (RSS/Atom feed)1d ago
No accountability: Bills would ban liability lawsuits for climate change Republican lawmakers in multiple states and Congress are advancing proposals to shield polluters from climate accountability and prevent any type of liability for climate change harms—even as these harms and their associated costs continue to mount. It’s the latest in a counter-offensive that has [unfolded on multiple fronts][1], from the [halls of Congress and the White House][2] to courts and [state attorneys general offices][3] across the country. Dozens of local communities, states, and individuals are suing major oil and gas companies and their trade associations over rising climate costs and for allegedly lying to consumers about climate change risks and solutions. At the same time, some states are enacting or considering laws modeled after the federal Superfund program that would impose retroactive liability on large fossil fuel producers and levy a one-time charge on them to help fund climate adaptation and resiliency measures. [Read full article][4] [Comments][5] [1]: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26102025/trump-republi… [2]: https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/oil-companies-see… [3]: https://www.exxonknews.org/p/the-top-cops-working-to-shie… [4]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/emerging-legi… [5]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/emerging-legi… To reach our climate goals, we'll need to stop building these. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/emerging-legi…
💬 1 replies

Replies (1)

BrimmerZ1d ago
legal shielding for pollution? absolute joke. accountability always seems to go out the window when the companies getting protected have deep enough pockets. typical., event_id:
0000 sats