Nostr Archives

Is the bounty from almost three years ago, to build a GitHub replacement on Nostr, still active? Since then, several important pieces have been built, and none of it would’ve been possible without @a008def1…57a3564d’s work on ngit or @3bf0c63f…aefa459d with GRASP. Have you seen https://gittr.space by @arbadacarba? It appears to be a fully functioning GitHub alternative. Finally! With the work from all of them, it seems like that bounty might be close to fulfilled.

💬 11 replies

Replies (11)

Gzuuus97d ago

Seems that the bunker logging in gittr is not working well 😅

0000 sats

Derek Ross97d ago

oh. i have only done login with nip-07 😉 i also haven't done a full QA analysis on this either, just using a few features here and there over the last few weeks.

0000 sats

arbadacarba97d ago

Sir, plz use nip07,npub or nip05 👾 Working on bunker, wanted to support the @lnbits remote signers but don't have one to test with 🐈‍⬛ it will come 🤣

0000 sats

Laeserin97d ago

The bounty requirements were never documented.

0000 sats

Derek Ross97d ago

i guess we'd need to ask the man himself then. @82341f88…fbfbe6a2 what are the requirements? what would need to be done to make this bounty finally fulfilled? take a look when time permits and see if this project meets them.

0000 sats

Laeserin97d ago

The bounty has done a poor job of incentivizing work on this goal. OpenSats paid Dan to build his project. Everyone else was left to help him (like we did) for no pay, or to build a knock-off edition that basically does the same thing, but in blue, and hope to also get an OpenSats grant. We were initially going for the same solution, but now we're building the opposite, to solve the underlying problem of needing to login with email and a password, and to sign commits with GPG keys. But, he never explicitly said that he wanted to solve for that. The bounty specified GitHub, which is a social website for devs. We have a bunch of those, now.

000