ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»21h ago
Poll support incoming But not zap polls, my opinion is this is an anti-user pattern: 1) why should the poller get all the money? 2) why should most money win poll? This isn't America Release coming tonight πŸ˜€
πŸ’¬ 31 replies

Replies (31)

d0enakalleπŸ‡βš‘21h ago
Because Bots can win any vote?
0000 sats
Ryan21h ago
Set limit at 1 sat. Then people can't buy the poll, and it will massively cut down on spam. Simple.
0000 sats
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»21h ago
Y'all think only bitcoiners should vote smh
0000 sats
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»21h ago
1) WoT
0000 sats
GhostπŸ‘»21h ago
Ok, cool. I've read the poll, I'm now all in on XRPπŸ™πŸ».
0000 sats
Tekkadan πŸ“²πŸ„πŸŒ21h ago
Circular economy poll payouts? πŸ‘€ I like.
0000 sats
7fqx21h ago
Let see how it goes:) it is already on jumble and pollerama, perhaps the bot attacks will only become apparent when all/most major clients have zapless polls. Literally no one uses amethyst zap polls, so it's not like that is the solution. Perhaps the option to choose between zap/zapless is good? (Although I'd never want to zap a poll and there never make one like that either). Anyway, great news:)))))
0000 sats
Karadenizli20h ago
Add polls but weighted by WoT score
0000 sats
semisol21h ago
Just zap multiple times?
0000 sats
d0enakalleπŸ‡βš‘21h ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arwZcw0Ejcc&t=11
0000 sats
Lysergic4cid20h ago
limit votes 1 person=1 vote=1 sat altho bot votes lol Saturday just got a new meaning
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona21h ago
Different use cases. You will implement both in the end.
0000 sats
d0enakalleπŸ‡βš‘21h ago
Yep, for new users a WoT poll won't have too many possible participants.
0000 sats
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»21h ago
New users more likely to have a follower than a lightning wallet with sats in it
0000 sats
Ryan21h ago
TBF polls will fill the feed for 3 days because they are novel, then never get used again like most features that get tagged on to clients. What we really need is a π™©π™π™žπ™§π™™ polling standard that actually works, like DMs πŸ˜‚
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona21h ago
Not even that. On WoT polls, the poll results changes for each observer or each algo. It's by definition non-cobsensus. On zaps, it's all based on money.
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona21h ago
Yep... Each feature gets highlighted for 3 days and then it just becomes a mess to maintain. :)
0000 sats
Ryan21h ago
Thisσ …˜σ …€σ …€σ … σ …£σ „ͺσ „Ÿσ „Ÿσ …σ …•σ …”σ …™σ …‘σ „žσ …€σ …•σ …žσ …Ÿσ …’σ „žσ …“σ …Ÿσ …σ „Ÿσ …¦σ …©σ …›σ …ƒσ …˜σ …¦σ …£σ „¦σ …‰σ …„σ „ σ „±σ „±σ „±σ „±σ „³σ „Ÿσ …‘σ …•σ …£σ … σ …‘σ „σ …§σ …™σ …žσ …€σ …•σ …’σ „σ …›σ … σ …Ÿσ … σ „žσ …—σ …™σ …– *Please add hidden text to wisp πŸ™
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona21h ago
Lol, pool utxo...
0000 sats
Yarnlady 🧢21h ago
0000 sats
d0enakalleπŸ‡βš‘21h ago
If they create the poll themselves, they don't need a single sat - they could even earn sats instead πŸ˜‰
0000 sats
Ryan21h ago
@Vitor Pamplona do zap polls work with zap splits? So you could redirect the payments to someone else? It would be neat if you could set different targets for the different poll options actually. Have people voted on which song they like better and the artist gets the zaps? You could use it for all kinds of contests.
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona21h ago
Frankly I don't know.. I wouldn't say so...
0000 sats
Ryan20h ago
Looks like they do actually. I just did a test with a poll, and a 100% split to you, it sent. Did you get it? Related bug report: user search in zap splits seems to be broken, nothing happens when you type in names or npub. I've got the latest search relays, and it works elsewhere in the app πŸ‘
0000 sats
Ryan20h ago
Oh. But it doesn't apply to the poll. Emergent behavior is fun 😊 πŸ“ 9724b694…
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona21h ago
* poor. @utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» wen EDITS????
0000 sats
Ryan21h ago
#YESTR
0000 sats
Yarnlady 🧢21h ago
0000 sats
Vitor Pamplona20h ago
Yep, I fixed that one already. That field still requires people to @ before the name ...
0000 sats